100 free welcome credits on sign-in→

Official SWE-bench Lite Evaluation

Benchmark Results

We benchmarked Codor on standard industry SWE-bench issues across Flask, Requests, and Pytest — measuring exact execution time, tool efficiency, and real user costs.

Pricing reflects user credit consumption (100 Credits = $1.00 USD) compared directly against unoptimized frontier models solving the identical issues.

Issue / TaskRepositoryTimeToolsTokensCodor CostClaude SonnetClaude Opus
pytest-dev__pytest-5227pytest-dev/pytest74.8s813.1k5.4 cr ($0.05)26 cr ($0.26)131 cr ($1.31)
pallets__flask-4992pallets/flask85.2s1319.1k7.9 cr ($0.08)38 cr ($0.38)191 cr ($1.91)
pallets__flask-4045pallets/flask135.5s1622.7k9.4 cr ($0.09)45 cr ($0.45)227 cr ($2.27)
pallets__flask-5063pallets/flask142.3s1217.9k7.4 cr ($0.07)36 cr ($0.36)179 cr ($1.79)
psf__requests-2148psf/requests154.8s1319.1k7.9 cr ($0.08)38 cr ($0.38)191 cr ($1.91)
pytest-dev__pytest-7432pytest-dev/pytest182.4s1116.7k6.9 cr ($0.07)33 cr ($0.33)167 cr ($1.67)
Total / Avg (6 Tasks)129s avg73 calls108.6k44.9 cr ($0.45)216 cr ($2.16)1,086 cr ($10.86)
100% patch generation rate across all 6 benchmarked tasks.
User rate: 100 Credits = $1.00 USD (Non-expiring credit packs)